<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Decisions, Decisions</title>
      <link>http://realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1464</link>
      <description>Real Kato Comments</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate></pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>Ken's RSS Script</generator>
      <item>
         <title>Decisions, Decisions</title>
         <link>http://realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1464</link>
         <description>So it comes down to this. I could get a high-end iMac and have it last me for five years, or I could get a Mac mini and replace it in two years. A mini can easily be repurposed into a server; an iMac has to remain a useful as a desktop because it really can't be anything else.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can get the bottom-end mini and add my own RAM and upgraded hard drive; I'm pretty sure I could put in 4GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive from Other World Computing for less than $200. So if I go the mini route, I could probably come in under $800.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If I go for the iMac, I'd probably have to shell out $1799 or $2199 to get something that would last. But then I'd have a pretty decent gaming rig, and I wouldn't have to use a putty knife to get the specs up to what I want. Also I'd have the nice 24" screen.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But you know, it's not like I play many computer games any more, other than City of Heroes, which doesn't really need a fast GPU. Maybe I'd &lt;i&gt;start&lt;/i&gt; playing more computer games if I had a machine that supported them? Yeah, that's just what I need, something to consume more of my free time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think I'm leaning towards the mini. Slightly.</description>
         <author>Ken</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
         <guid>http://realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1464</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
