Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Unknown Hinson | Next: On Gonzalez v. Carha... >>

Apple Watch: On the Leopard Delay
Wednesday, 2007 April 18 - 7:29 am
It's not the end of the world.

So, as you may know by now, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard has been delayed to October. The official reason given by Apple: Engineering and QA resources had to be shifted to work on the iPhone to get it out in June.

Some Mac web sites and bloggers are up in arms about this. The degree of windy hyperbole is staggering: "Now, Apple is going to take some serious hits from analysts, investors, and even the PC camp," says an article on The Mac Observer.

Let's be clear on a couple of things. First of all, this isn't that big a deal. The number of people who will base their Mac purchasing decisions based on the version of Mac OS X is miniscule. Unlike Microsoft, whose revenue depends on software sales, Apple's revenue depends mostly on hardware sales. Will some people buy a Vista-based PC because they don't want to buy Tiger? Probably. But I just can't see that having a significant effect on the bottom line. The Mac base will remain faithful, and iPod and iPhone sales will remain just fine.

Second, a lot of people apparently don't have a clue as to the real cause of software project delays. That same Mac Observer article (written by a former Apple marketing manager) suggests that Leopard's delay is because VPs and middle managers aren't empowered to make staffing decisions, and because Apple is paying too much attention to operating expenses (and thus not hiring enough engineers). That's typical manager-think there. "If we only had more people, the project would get done faster."

It's a plausible story to tell analysts, but a simple fact of software engineering is this: large, complicated projects take time. There are two main reasons that software projects are late: one, because of poor planning up front (leading to poor engineering decisions), and two, because of feature creep (the desire to keep adding extra unplanned functionality to the system). The larger a project is, the more likely it is that there'll be a delay. So for something on the scale of Leopard, a delay was inevitable. Apple's biggest mistake was announcing the "spring 2007" deadline so far in advance.

So yeah, the delay is disappointing, and we Mac users who derided Vista for its lengthy series of delays will have to eat some crow. But really, let's not lose our heads, OK?
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: techwatch

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind