Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Watch Out Ladies | Next: Good News, Bad News >>

Supreme Court Rulings
Monday, 2005 June 27 - 11:19 pm
Today's SCOTUS rulings shouldn't really be a surprise or disappointment to anyone.

The Supreme Court ruled today that certain displays with religious subjects should not be displayed on government property. In Kentucky, where framed copies of the Ten Commandments were posted, the Court ruled that it was a predominantly religious display, and that it should be taken down. In Texas, where the Ten Commandments were displayed on with other monuments and statues, the Court ruled it was okay. Both were narrowly worded 5-4 rulings that might not be much of precedent for future cases.

In a separate decision, the court unanimously ruled that file-sharing services such as Grokster and StreamCast could be sued by Hollywood for the fact that copyrighted materials are distributed via their networks. But they only said so with because the companies had the "unmistakable" objective of promoting illegal distribution. So this ruling, too, has some wiggle room.

These rulings are all in keeping with this Court's tradition. We've seen a lot of rulings that are in keeping with common sense and the majority sentiment of the country, but are also targeted narrowly enough such that changing future circumstances could cause a reversal. So in that sense, I see the current Court as a little bit timid. They don't want to make big overreaching decisions (except, maybe, when it comes to crowning a President in a disputed election).

In fifty years, when current copyright laws are hopelessly out of date, the file-sharing decision will be utterly meaningless. And in three hundred years, when "Star Wars" and "The Da Vinci Code" have replaced Christianity as the predominant religions in the United States, the Ten Commandments rulings will be meaningless too.

One other sidebar about the Ten Commandments, by the way: there are actually multiple interpretations of what the Ten Commandments really are. That's something I mentioned a while ago. There's a document (42 kB PDF file) about it, if you're interested.
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: commentarypolitics

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind