Real Kato Blog: Miscellany

It's like a piece of wire with a little piece of fabric on it. The term "C-String" seems misleading, as there are no strings to speak of. It hangs on to the crotch area by force of pressure... the pressure exerted by the wire, and the kegel-like pressure exerted by the woman. The point is apparently to reduce the horrors of VPLs (visible panty lines).

The only advantages over going completely panty-less: one, to avoid a Britney-like incident as you're stepping out of a limo; two, to contain any embarrassing leakage you might have going on.

There are many difficult things about being a man, but at least we don't have to consider wearing things like this.

A majority of British women prefer chocolate to sex, saying it can be depended on to give pleasure.

No snide remarks from the peanut gallery. Not even the chocolate-covered peanut gallery.

The real question is, why would any woman have to make this choice? It's not like there's any shortage of men who want to have sex, or of chocolate. So here's a more interesting poll question for you women out there: would chocolate be enough to change your mind about whether you'd have sex with any particular guy? To put it another way: if you had to either give up chocolate for life, or have sex with Creepy Chuck from the office... which would you choose?

Permalink 3 Comment

Posted by Ken in: commentary

Comments

Comment #1 from Noelle (Guest)
2007 Jun 8 - 9:54 am : #

I'm perplexed by this c-string... how does it "attach" in the back?

Comment #2 from Brett (Guest)
2007 Jun 13 - 10:17 pm : #

They should call it the "You Don't C-String." Get it?

Comment #3 from Ellen (Guest)
2007 Jun 18 - 11:58 pm : #

ok, its late...I already said that in my last comment...

My little secret is that sex with Creepy Chuck is more than likely really, really great sex...the normal Joes out there really suck in bed!

Comments are closed for this post.

Search This Site