Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Still More Stuff | Next: Apple Watch: Macworl... >>

Apple Watch: Macworld Roundup, Part I
Wednesday, 2006 January 11 - 1:49 pm
New Intel-based Macs from Apple.

Another exciting Macworld for us Apple fans.

The new iMac is officially the first Mac to get Intel processors, though only by a few minutes. It's exactly the same as the previous iMac G5, except now it sports an Intel Core Duo processor... it's a dual-core processor running at 1.83 GHz (on the 17" model) or 2.00 GHz (on the 20" model). Apple estimates that this processor is two to three times faster than the single-core G5 that the iMac used to have. Of course, this is partly based on the SPEC benchmarks that Apple always used to disavow, when comparing PowerPCs against Intel processors. The fact is, SPEC is slanted towards the Intel design, so this comparison isn't entirely a surprise.

I would expect that in real-world performance, the new Intel iMac will be somewhat faster for most tasks, perhaps 50-75% faster. Graphics performance should improve more substantially than other areas, thanks to the inclusion of the PCI Express-based ATI Radeon X1600 graphics processor. But the Rosetta emulation environment for non-native code will slow things down a bit, in the short term, until developers complete their transition to making universal binaries.

The bigger story is probably the new MacBook Pro laptop. I don't fault Apple for changing the PowerBook name to include "Mac" in it, though I think "MacBook Pro" sounds a little bit clunky. But eh, people will get used to it.

The MacBook Pro is currently only available in the 15" form factor. It also supports a the Intel Core Duo, at 1.67 GHz or 1.83 GHz. It includes the "Mobility" version of the ATI Radeon X1600. And perhaps most importantly, there's a 4X improvement in front-side bus speed, up to 667 MHz from 167 MHz. Overall, this thing should be much faster than the PowerBook G4.

There are a few new features, like the built-in iSight, and the infrared remote control (for running FrontRow). An ExpressCard/34 slot replaces the old PowerBook's PC Card slot; the new card interface is significantly faster, but owners of existing PC cards will be out of luck. A new magnetic connector for the power cord is very cool; having tripped over my power cord several times, nearly breaking my laptop, I'd appreciate something like this.

Curiously, there are a few things that could be considered "downgrades". The SuperDrive is a 4X single-layer drive instead of an 8X dual-layer drive. The Firewire 800 port is gone, leaving only a Firewire 400 port. There's no built-in S-video output. Some of this is probably due to size and weight goals; some of it may be due to Intel's influence (I'm looking at the lack of Firewire 800 in particular).

There's no mention of what the battery life of this machine will be. Maybe Apple is still working on that. People who played around with the machines in Apple's Macworld booth say the built-in battery timer showed about 3 hours when AC power was disconnected, but that figure might be wildly misleading.

Looking at the specs overall, I'd guess that this machine is designed to appeal to the executive-traveler type, not so much to creative professionals looking for a portable media-processing platform.

At $1999, the MacBook Pro is clearly intended as the successor to the PowerBook; it's not an iBook replacement, as so many rumor sites suggested we'd see. Curiously, Apple continues to sell the PowerBook G4 at the previous price points. When are we going to see some close-out discounts? Surely sales of the PowerBook will plummet now.

What didn't we see? As I predicted (patting myself on the back here), there was no Intel-based iBook and no Intel-based Mini. We also didn't see a tablet, a handheld, or an "iPhone". And for crying out loud, did anyone believe that ridiculous plasma-TV rumor? Sheesh.
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: techwatch

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind