Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Apple Watch: Apple B... | Next: The Blog Network >>

The Worst Kind of Liberalism
Monday, 2005 March 14 - 8:23 am
The editors at the Harvard Crimson recently advocated a boycott of a fledgling dorm-room cleaning service. Why? Because not all students could afford to use it.

Dormaid is a dorm-room cleaning business started by sophomore Harvard student Michael Kopko. In an editorial a couple of days ago, Harvard's daily newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, advocated a campus-wide boycott of the service. The rationale given was that only wealthier students are able to afford clean dorm rooms, and thus, such a service creates a visible difference between rich and poor. Therefore, the service threatens the "egalitarian nature of dorm life".

My question is this: in what kind of fantasy world are these guys living? When I was in a dorm, there was no illusion of egalitarianism. Some kids had nice furniture; others (like me) had garage-sale rejects. Some kids had stereos; some just had boom-boxes. Some kids had computers in their rooms; others didn't. Some kids had cool clothes; others didn't. Sure, we all lived in the same kinds of rooms. But that didn't make us all the same. And certainly, the guys with clean rooms weren't seen as any better than the guys with dirty rooms; everyone just assumed they were gay.

The really rich kids didn't live in the dorms at all. They lived in fraternity houses or apartments.

The idea that the Crimson espouses boils down to this: if everyone can't have something, then no one should have it, because we don't want to have visible class differences... at least, when it comes to the dorms. To call a spade a spade: this is the essence of communism. This is the sort of social policy that gives liberals a bad name. We should promote egalitarianism by lifting up the oppressed classes, not by punishing all of society and dragging everyone down to the lowest common denominator.

I mean, what's next? Should everyone be issued uniforms? Should students also boycott jewelry stores and upscale restaurants? Should cars be banned from campus?

It scares me a little when I'm on the same side as Rush Limbaugh on any topic, but in this case, I have to support the free-market view. There's nothing about Dormaid that is elitist or discriminatory; it's a legitimate enterprise and we should leave it alone. Don't worry, I'm not becoming a Republican... but I'd like Republicans to know that not all liberals are communists, either.
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: commentary

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind