Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Girlfriend Update: A... | Next: Wealth >>

Liability
Friday, 2005 October 21 - 1:18 am
Would you like fries with that?

Right now, Congress is voting to prohibit lawsuits that claim fast food restaurants are responsible for people's obesity. They're also voting to prohibit lawsuits against the gun industry for causing gun-related deaths.

Let me make a couple of things clear. First, I recognize the harm that both guns and fast food are doing to our country, and I'm definitely in favor of curbing that harm. Second, I recognize that the current legislation is actually probably an attempt by Republicans to effect a long-term reduction in the power of trial attorneys in this country. But even with that, I have to say, I'm not entirely against the proposed legislation. Call me a bad Democrat, but this is definitely not a black-and-white issue for me. I'm very much ambivalent about it.

Let me present some arguments on both sides.

----------

The Pro-Industry Argument

To my knowledge (IANAL), we do not have laws that hold corporations responsible when legal products are knowingly used in a harmful manner. We do not hold auto manufacturers responsible for drunk drivers who kill people; for that matter, we don't put liability on manufacturers of alcoholic beverages either. Manufacturers of kitchen knives and baseball bats are not held responsible when those items are used as weapons. Why should we single out the gun industry for litigation? (No fair comparing guns to, say, weapons of mass destruction; remember, guns are legal in this country.)

Similarly, why should we single out the fast-food industry, as compared to Golden Corral, or the all-you-can-eat Chinese buffet around the corner? The answer is probably the fact that the gun industry and the fast food industry are wealthy and politically unpopular targets, ripe for plucking in front of an impressionable jury. Is that the way we want to practice law and government in this country? By conducting a propaganda war?

----------

The Pro-Consumer Argument

If we really believe in the rightness of gun manufacturers and fast-food purveyors, then we should have nothing to fear from legislation. People suing? Everyone should be entitled to their day in court. We have not established sufficient precedent concerning manufacturer liability in these cases; why not let due process take its course, instead of stifling potential victims before they can even speak up?

Perhaps the industry is not to blame. But that's not to say we should pass heavy-handed legislation that prevents anyone from even questioning them. What if we'd shielded the tobacco companies thirty years ago? Now that we've found that they deliberately hid information about the harmful effects of their products, wouldn't we regret having a shield law protecting them?

----------

It's a tough one. If you're an idealist, you might believe that corporations never set out to be deliberately evil. But then again, you might also believe that people only file lawsuits when they are legitimately wronged. In reality, neither idea is true. So it comes down to this: how is the public interest better served? Which is the greater problem in this country: frivolous lawsuits by greedy individuals seeking to avoid personal responsibility, or the machinations of greedy corporations looking to profit from people's misery at any cost? I don't know.

But with this legislation, I feel like we're just masking the real problems in this country. Why do people eat fast food to begin with? Why do people feel the need to own guns? There are underlying societal issues here, and maybe we should be tackling those issues instead of just jumping on a hot political bandwagon.
Permalink  1 Comment   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: politics

Comments

Comment #1 from Noelle (Guest)
2005 Oct 21 - 11:04 am : #
People eat fast food because it's cheap. We are most likely the only place on earth where the poverty stricken are fat. People like to shoot guns. Even I like to shoot guns. Done in a safe, regulated and target competative enviornment it's a legit sport. Frankly I don't understand why anyone would want to own a video game player - But I don't wonder why other's feel the need to own one.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind