Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 July
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Movies: Eternal Suns... | Next: Edwards Wins North C... >>

Movies: Lost In Translation
Monday, 2004 April 5 - 1:12 am
This Oscar-winning movie from rookie writer/director Sophia Coppola is warm, subtle, and touching.

So first, there have been a lot of folks who wondered whether the portrayal of Japan in this movie was a fair one. As a Japanese-American, I'd say this: it sincerely portrays Japan as it would be seen through the eyes of an American. It isn't offensive in the least; it just doesn't really get at the depth of Japanese culture.

But that's okay, because that's the entire point. The country is supposed to feel foreign, and the two main characters (Bill Murray, Scarlett Johansson) are supposed to be out of place. Their characters are lost, in life. They feel isolated in their existence, an isolation which only becomes apparent when magnified by the effect of being in a strange country.

That's really the extent of the movie. There's no huge conflict or intense drama here, no wild romance. It's more of a Zen-like observation on the human condition (making Japan an appropriate backdrop). The movie is about how the characters discover that they are not alone in their isolation, and that gives them hope.

It's a very subtle message, but an uplifting one. I found it refreshing that the movie did not fall into a war-of-the-sexes story line (except once; more on this in a moment). Instead, the movie treats men and women as equally lonely, equally put-upon, equally needy.

There is one totally unnecessary and out-of-place scene in this movie, where Bill Murray gets drunk and spends the night with a jazz singer. I can see where Coppola was trying to inject a dramatic moment into the movie, but this was not the way to do it; it runs contrary to the style of the rest of the movie.

But that aside, I found the story to be thoughtfully put-together. The direction was slow-paced, but never plodding. Bill Murray did a fine job (and he was Coppola's first choice, though I might have put Tom Hanks here instead). Scarlett Johannson was radiant and showed a good deal of range.

Overall, I'd say this was a good movie to see on a quiet night; not particularly energizing or thought-provoking, but rather, kind of soothing.

Rating: 3.5 / 5
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: moviesreviews

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind